Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
Date: 2009-07-14 17:21:09
Message-ID: 4A5CBE85.5050607@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Chuck McDevitt wrote:
>>
>> Flex 2.5.33 and bison 2.3 are available from mingw for windows.
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/
>>
>> Since mingw programs don't need Cygwin installed, these should
>> probably be OK for most Windows people.
>>
>> But if really needed, flex 2.5.33 could be ported (m4 is already
>> ported).
>>
>> I'm also wonderings why flex is a problem, since there is a GNUwin32
>> (native) port of Bison 2.4.1 and m4,
>> And Bison uses m4 these days, doesn't it? Perhaps it wouldn't be so
>> hard to update flex to use the same m4 calling that bison uses?
>>
>>
>>
>
> It is part of the MSys utilities, and requires that you have MSys
> installed. MSys is in effect a Cygwin equivalent. The flex from MinGW
> will NOT run standalone. I have tried.
>
> If you think it can be ported to run standalone (i.e. without either
> Cygwin or MSys), have at it. Or take my advice and don't waste time
> trying.
>
>

What I have done is built a version of flex 2.5.35 with Cygwin, and
bundled the .exe with the Cygwin DLL (the only other thing it should
need, for our purposes) in a zip file. It can currently be fetched from
<http://developer.postgresql.org/~adunstan/windows-flex-2.5.35.zip>.
That way people won't have to do a full Cygwin or MSys install to use it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mischa Sandberg 2009-07-14 17:43:46 Re: Index-only scans
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2009-07-14 17:19:38 Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows