| From: | Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Leif B(dot) Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB? |
| Date: | 2009-07-01 14:54:20 |
| Message-ID: | 4A4B789C.5090002@Sheeky.Biz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 14:59 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> JD,
>>
>>> I have been thinking about this thread quite a bit and I have come to
>>> the conclusion that I don't like the idea of an EDB survey being
>>> announced and publicized through .Org. It isn't news, it isn't an event,
>>> it is not an announcement of a new Postgresql derived product. It is
>>> purely a way to drive eyes to EDB and away from PostgreSQL.
>> How? It'll be run on an independant survey site, and we'll get the results.
>
> I missed that part. That does change things a bit. If this is going to
> be hosted independently but "sponsored by EDB for Postgresql.org" then I
> remove my objection.
>
Me too. Looking back I see that it was only asked to promote the survey
on our site and mailing lists, but most of us seemed to assume it was to
host the survey on our site.
No objections to only promoting their survey.
--
Shane Ambler
pgSQL (at) Sheeky (dot) Biz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-07-01 14:54:41 | Release is out ... please collect press links! |
| Previous Message | Santiago Zarate | 2009-07-01 08:34:08 | Re: Joint user survey with EnterpriseDB? |