Re: Welcome to the pgsql-bugs list!

From: Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Christine Penner <christine(at)ingenioussoftware(dot)com>, Postgres-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Welcome to the pgsql-bugs list!
Date: 2009-04-28 20:19:07
Message-ID: 49F764BB.40808@iol.ie
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 28/04/2009 21:09, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 12:59 -0700, Christine Penner wrote:
>> After looking closer at the log file I found something interesting:
>
>> This backup included the table creating aswell. How can it not have a
>> column in the table. Am I wrong to assume that when I restore over an
>> existing database it will delete things first? It looks like it doesn't.
>
> No it will not delete things first. I think that would be a serious
> design flaw if it did so.

If you want to see how the backup and restore works, do a backup with
the PLAIN option and read through the resulting SQL file. The
compress/tar options produce the same output only, well,
compressed/tarred. :-)

Ray.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
rod(at)iol(dot)ie
Galway Cathedral Recitals: http://www.galwaycathedral.org/recitals
------------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Rich 2009-04-28 20:28:40 Re: UPDATE... FROM - will ORDER BY not respected?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-04-28 20:09:46 Re: Welcome to the pgsql-bugs list!