Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date: 2009-04-21 16:04:22
Message-ID: 49EDA836.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> \df[S+] [PATTERN] list functions
> \df[antwS+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions

Shouldn't that second line have some curly braces? Like maybe:

\df{antw}[S+] [PATTERN] list only agg/normal/trigger/window functions

Technically, it should probably be even more verbose, but this might
be adequate.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message May, Randy 2009-04-21 16:08:40 Re: [ADMIN] License Issue
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-04-21 15:53:39 Re: [ADMIN] License Issue