Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Date: 2009-03-27 17:00:42
Message-ID: 49CD063A.1080906@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> BTW, does pg_dumpall know to dump ALTER USER SET settings attached
> to built-in roles (such as the proposed "autovacuum" role)? I'd bet
> it doesn't do that. Even if it does, that seems like a more awkward
> way to push settings over to a new installation than copying your
> postgresql.conf file.
>
> Simon's idea of "profiles" sounds worth pursuing to me, but clearly
> it's not happening for 8.4.

I don't see why having a *separate* concept of profiles in addition to
the ROLES is helpful. It seems like building a whole new house when all
we really need is to expand the garage.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2009-03-27 17:03:46 Re: 8.4 open items list
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-27 16:40:02 Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets