Re: parallel restore fixes

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore fixes
Date: 2009-03-11 15:19:34
Message-ID: 49B7D686.60906@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> OK, here 'tis.
>
> Looks fairly reasonable to me, but of course I haven't tested it.

Well, I have to do a blitz of parallel restores next week, so hopefully
that will hit any soft spots.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2009-03-11 15:26:08 Re: Out parameters handling
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-03-11 15:05:39 Re: idea, proposal: only preloadable libraries (conditional load)