Re: parallel restore fixes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel restore fixes
Date: 2009-03-10 21:39:38
Message-ID: 15395.1236721178@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> OK, here 'tis.

Looks fairly reasonable to me, but of course I haven't tested it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-03-10 22:57:31 Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-03-10 20:39:59 Re: parallel restore fixes