Re: pg_restore new option -m

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore new option -m
Date: 2009-02-19 15:07:03
Message-ID: 499D7597.50602@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr wrote:
>>
>>> pg_restore -C -m 4 -d template1 db.dmp
>>> gives numerous errors, mostly no such relation at index creation time.
>>
>> You sure you don't get exactly the same without -m?
>>
> yes!

> the pg.gz script shows the output of :
> pg_restore -C -m
> pg_restore -C
> dropdb;createdb; pg_restore -m
>
>

OK, I'll look at it later today.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2009-02-19 15:36:08 Re: autovacuum not honoring pg_autovacuum in 8.3.5?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-02-19 15:05:32 Re: pg_restore new option -m