Re: autovacuum not honoring pg_autovacuum in 8.3.5?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: autovacuum not honoring pg_autovacuum in 8.3.5?
Date: 2009-02-19 15:36:08
Message-ID: 200902191036.09368.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday 16 February 2009 11:20:11 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Thanks for the work around, but that is ridiculous. I still say this is
> > a bug.
>
> Yes, which is why we fixed it on 8.4 by dropping pg_autovacuum. (As
> Jaime and Tom say, it's actually pilot error, but the UI is crap so we
> fixed it.)
>

A little confused by this...

robert=# select version();
version
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 8.4devel on i386-pc-solaris2.10, compiled by cc: Sun C 5.9
SunOS_i386 2007/05/03, 32-bit
(1 row)

robert=# \d pg_catalog.pg_autovacuum
Did not find any relation named "pg_catalog.pg_autovacuum".
robert=# \dtS+ pg_catalog.pg_autovacuum
List of relations
Schema | Name | Type | Owner | Size | Description
------------+---------------+-------+--------+---------+-------------
pg_catalog | pg_autovacuum | table | robert | 0 bytes |
(1 row)

I think this build is a couple weeks old, but is the pg_autovacuum table
really gone in 8.4, or just deprecated?

--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2009-02-19 15:56:07 Re: autovacuum not honoring pg_autovacuum in 8.3.5?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-02-19 15:07:03 Re: pg_restore new option -m