Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed

From: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
Date: 2009-01-20 16:42:54
Message-ID: 4975FF0E.9050407@esilo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Chernow wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Ah, OK, so it does its own cleanup on last close, great. I agree a
>>> connection option for this would be good.
>>>
>> What would the option be? "wsainit = [enable | disable]"? Maybe it
>> should allow setting the version to load: "wsa_version = 2.0". Maybe
>> the two should be combined: "wsa_version = [default | disable | 2.0]".
>
> I assumed it would be like SSL, which is a libpq function call, not a
> connection option, e.g. PQinitSSL(), and I think true/false is probably
> enough. PQinitSSL info:
>
> If you are using <acronym>SSL</> inside your application (in addition
> to inside <application>libpq</application>), you can use
> <function>PQinitSSL(int)</> to tell <application>libpq</application>
> that the <acronym>SSL</> library has already been initialized by your
> application.
>

That smells dirty to me. How many PQinitXXX() functions are needed
before we drop the XXX and run with PQinit(...)?

--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-20 16:47:06 Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-20 16:42:49 Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed