| From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? |
| Date: | 2008-11-26 22:24:01 |
| Message-ID: | 492DCC81.6000006@pinpointresearch.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 18:06 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>>
>>> Since were chatting :P. My vote would be to move everything back to port
>>> 22 and force key based auth only.
>>>
>> How does that work? Does that kill the script kiddies in their tracks? I'm
>> guessing so, but had never thought to try it ...
>>
>>
>
> Well they can still talk to the port of course but its irrelevant...
>
>
Not really. My servers don't allow remote root ssh access at all. But
all the failed script-kiddie attempts really hose the log files to say
nothing about wasting my bandwidth.
Cheers,
Steve
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-11-26 22:31:51 | Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-11-26 22:14:19 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |