| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? |
| Date: | 2008-11-26 22:12:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1227737562.9359.230.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 18:06 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> > Since were chatting :P. My vote would be to move everything back to port
> > 22 and force key based auth only.
>
> How does that work? Does that kill the script kiddies in their tracks? I'm
> guessing so, but had never thought to try it ...
>
Well they can still talk to the port of course but its irrelevant
because unless they have an ssh key, they aren't getting in. Period.
> How would someone upload their key if they don't have access? Some sort of web
> interface? One wouldn't want to throw extra admin overhead if it can be
> avoided ...
>
See other comment on this.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-11-26 22:14:19 | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-11-26 22:11:50 | Re: What's going on with pgfoundry? |