Re: Visibility map, partial vacuums

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Visibility map, partial vacuums
Date: 2008-11-23 22:28:51
Message-ID: 4929D923.7050001@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> However, my comment above was too optimistic, because in an insert-only
> scenario autovac would in fact not trigger VACUUM at all, only ANALYZE.
>
> So it seems like we do indeed want to rejigger autovac's rules a bit
> to account for the possibility of wanting to apply vacuum to get
> visibility bits set.

I'm sure I'm missing something, but I thought the point of this was to
lessen the impact of VACUUM and now you are suggesting that we have to
add vacuums to tables that have never needed one before.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2008-11-24 01:34:17 Re: pgsql: Explicitly bind gettext() to the UTF8 locale when in use.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-11-23 21:18:42 Re: Visibility map, partial vacuums