Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change)

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change)
Date: 2008-11-18 15:24:44
Message-ID: 4922DE3C.1090001@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas napsal(a):
>>> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>>>> Just a very quick look on your patch. See my comments:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> 2) PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION should be bump
>>>
>>> The patch doesn't change the page layout AFAICS.
>>>
>>
>> It is good question what is and what is not page layout. I think that
>> toast implementation is a member of page layout. OK it is called page
>> layout but better name should be On Disk Format (ODF). You will not
>> able to read 8.3 toasted table in 8.4.
>
> It's clearly just a catalog change; the number and meaning of attributes
> has changed, and that's reflected in CATALOG_VERSION_NO.

If I'm thinking more, it is not probably CATALOG_VERSION_NO as well. Because
toast table is created on demand. It is not in BKI.

Maybe we should add something like TOAST_VERSION.

Do we bump catalog version when AM bump version?

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-11-18 15:29:53 Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()?
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-11-18 15:20:42 Re: Updated posix fadvise patch v19