Re: Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change)
Date: 2008-11-18 15:31:31
Message-ID: 20081118153131.GB4141@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zdenek Kotala wrote:

> If I'm thinking more, it is not probably CATALOG_VERSION_NO as well.
> Because toast table is created on demand. It is not in BKI.

It's not catversion in the sense that there's no catalog change, but it
certainly requires a catversion bump due to internal changes.
Otherwise, developers who have working data directories today will see
weird errors when they update to a CVS version after this commit.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2008-11-18 15:32:06 Re: TABLE command
Previous Message Robert Haas 2008-11-18 15:29:53 Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()?