Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions

From: Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>
To: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>, andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions
Date: 2018-06-12 14:44:37
Message-ID: 48c18168-005d-70da-37ad-c6406831a278@chrullrich.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* On 2018-06-12 16:35, Geoff Winkless wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 13:41, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>> UNBOUNDED would be terrible. It does not mean the same thing as UNBOUND.
>
> Indeed. I agree.
>
>> Perhaps something like NO CHECK would meet the case, i.e. we're not
>> checking the link at function creation time.
>
> I did wonder about "NO CHECK" but wasn't sure if having two words
> would make the parser change more complex.

DEFERRED?

--
Christian

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-06-12 14:51:59 Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.in added in v11 development
Previous Message Christian Ullrich 2018-06-12 14:40:33 Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.in added in v11 development