Re: A small note about the difficulty of managing subprojects

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A small note about the difficulty of managing subprojects
Date: 2008-10-13 03:15:20
Message-ID: 48F2BD48.9000403@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> So ... I couldn't help noticing that the consensus among the Perl guys
> seemed to be that "90% of what is on CPAN is unmaintained crap".
> (They agree however that the other 10% is what makes it worth doing; and
> furthermore that you can't easily tell which fraction any new project
> will fall into.)
>
> Maybe pgfoundry isn't doing so bad after all. Just sayin'.

Yeah I would agree with that. I find that only "real" issue with
PgFoundry is the PgFoundry (aka Gforge) not the quality of the projects
being hosted.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hitoshi Harada 2008-10-13 05:06:51 Re: SELECT TOP %d PERCENT, or SELECT ... LIMIT %d PERCENT ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-13 03:12:29 A small note about the difficulty of managing subprojects