Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date: 2008-09-03 15:20:51
Message-ID: 48BEAB53.3020501@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark wrote:
> I don't think worrying about the message we send to users is reasonable.
> We can take responsibilty for the messages we output but punishing our
> users to teach them a lesson is being actively user-hostile

There is no arguing that MB != Mb; nor is there anything user-hostile
behind the idea of doing it the right way.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-03 15:26:26 Re: Question regarding the database page layout.
Previous Message Greg Stark 2008-09-03 15:09:22 Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code