Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Joshua Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Martin Pihlak" <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Dimitri Fontaine" <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Date: 2008-08-19 18:46:45
Message-ID: 48AACEC5.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>> Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> Is our backpatch policy documented? It does not appear to be in
> developer FAQ.

It's mentioned here:

http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning

"PostgreSQL minor releases fix only frequently-encountered, security,
and data corruption bugs to reduce the risk of upgrading."

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-08-19 18:47:13 Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-08-19 18:40:30 Re: Adjusting debug_print_plan to be more useful by default