| From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
| Date: | 2008-08-19 18:32:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20080819113242.7770e427@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:29:52 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Do I think it should be pushed back to 8.3.x; no. It is a feature. I
> > don't consider the existing behavior a bug. I consider it a
> > limitation and we don't back patch fixes for limitations.
>
> The bottom line here is that we don't have the time to explain or
> justify our backpatch policy every time someone shows up with a bug
> that needs to be fixed.
Is our backpatch policy documented? It does not appear to be in
developer FAQ.
Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-08-19 18:34:47 | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-08-19 18:29:52 | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |