Re: PostgreSQL derivatives

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Seth Grimes <grimes(at)altaplana(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Date: 2008-06-09 18:10:19
Message-ID: 484D720B.1080400@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Jonah,

> Hmm, how did you come to that conclusion? From every definition of
> MPP I can find, GridSQL meets the requirements.
>
> GridSQL:
> - Acts as a single, large-scale system by means of shared-nothing
> clustering (as does Greenplum IIRC)
> - Partitions and executes independent units-of-work in parallel across
> multiple independent microprocessors
> - Is capable of scaling to hundreds (if not thousands) of nodes
>
> What definition are you using, because I can't seem to find it in my top 5?

I was looking at the inability to do unrestricted joins across nodes,
but I realize that there are other MPP systems that have the same
restriction. So I guess that's too fine a restriction.

What's the largest GridSQL cluster anyone's tested, so far? Could we
look at using it for TPC-H?

--Josh

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2008-06-09 18:40:10 Re: Live CDs for upcoming shows
Previous Message Seth Grimes 2008-06-09 15:37:06 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives