| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Seth Grimes" <grimes(at)altaplana(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |
| Date: | 2008-06-09 00:13:43 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920806081713w6aa63d00la42846f464ed0aaf@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I wouldn't classify GridSQL as MPP. It's strictly PP.
Hmm, how did you come to that conclusion? From every definition of
MPP I can find, GridSQL meets the requirements.
GridSQL:
- Acts as a single, large-scale system by means of shared-nothing
clustering (as does Greenplum IIRC)
- Partitions and executes independent units-of-work in parallel across
multiple independent microprocessors
- Is capable of scaling to hundreds (if not thousands) of nodes
What definition are you using, because I can't seem to find it in my top 5?
--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-06-09 08:24:08 | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-06-08 21:21:50 | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |