Re: pg_stat_io not tracking smgrwriteback() is confusing

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_stat_io not tracking smgrwriteback() is confusing
Date: 2023-05-04 19:41:57
Message-ID: 4801cf55-f426-61b7-bc1e-d0fabb3e30d6@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/4/23 12:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-05-03 11:36:10 -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> It'd be good if we can get this into Beta 1 if everyone is comfortable with
>> the patch.
>
> I think we need one more iteration, then I think it can be committed. The
> changes are docs phrasing and polishing the API a bit, which shouldn't be too
> hard. I'll try to look more tomorrow.

[RMT hat, personal opinion]

Great to hear. From my skim of the patch, I had thought the conclusion
would be something similar, but did want to hear from you & Melanie on that.

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message samay sharma 2023-05-04 21:57:32 Re: Overhauling "Routine Vacuuming" docs, particularly its handling of freezing
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-05-04 17:59:17 Re: A bug with ExecCheckPermissions