Re: A bug with ExecCheckPermissions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sergey Shinderuk <s(dot)shinderuk(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, o(dot)tselebrovskiy(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A bug with ExecCheckPermissions
Date: 2023-05-04 17:59:17
Message-ID: 20230504175917.vwq46sakb77tudyw@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-Mar-09, Amit Langote wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 7:39 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > I didn't like very much this business of setting the perminfoindex
> > directly to '2' and '1'. It looks ugly with no explanation. What do
> > you think of creating the as we go along and set each index
> > correspondingly, as in the attached?
>
> Agree it looks cleaner and self-explanatory that way. Thanks.

Thanks for looking! I have pushed it now. And many thanks to Oleg for
noticing and reporting it.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2023-05-04 19:41:57 Re: pg_stat_io not tracking smgrwriteback() is confusing
Previous Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2023-05-04 17:30:06 Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context?