| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-www www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGXN Hosting |
| Date: | 2011-05-11 20:18:39 |
| Message-ID: | 47F47BDA-0B07-4E8E-8AE5-AAB532F5F089@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On May 11, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> IIRC you can't do that with CPAN today for example, which is why
> people tend to prefer to rely on the DEB packaged CPAN modules,
> because then the packager takes on the responsibility to backpatch
> fixes.
That's correct. It's the same for PGXN.
>> As for packaging what's on PGXN, I've discussed a bit with Daniele, Magnus, and Devrim (via Twitter) the idea of having some kind of automated way for PGXN distributions to automatically be repackaged for RPM and/or .deb and/or StackBuilder distribution.
>
> Yeah, that's definitely something that would be *very* useful.
I think it'd be pretty do-able.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-05-11 20:37:43 | Re: PGXN Hosting |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-05-11 20:09:47 | Re: PGXN Hosting |