From: | Colin Wetherbee <cww(at)denterprises(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Brett Hoerner <bretthoerner(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages) |
Date: | 2008-03-31 17:46:07 |
Message-ID: | 47F1235F.6080301@denterprises.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Brett Hoerner" <bretthoerner(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Colin Wetherbee
>> <cww(at)denterprises(dot)org> wrote:
>>> I received eight of these unwanted digests last night and early
>>> this morning, after never seeing them before. Is this a new
>>> configuration change that I need to go personalize?
>
>> I was wondering the same thing, but don't see an option regarding
>> digests...
>
> Did you look closely at the Received: history of the messages?
>
> We occasionally get incidents where someone's broken mail software
> regurgitates delayed copies of list mail, either back to the list
> daemon (which is usually successful at recognizing duplicates, but
> not always) or directly to people named in the From: or To: or CC:
> lines of the mail. To no one's surprise, the mail software that does
> this is invariably Microsoft's.
Hmm, it doesn't seem to have to do with duplicates, since the eight
digests were different. On the other hand, I think you're probably
right about the these being related to bounces.
The following are the Received headers from before the list daemon sent
me the first digest.
Received: from marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx (gdl.cinvestav.mx [148.247.21.3])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7092E0030
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:37:09 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 7DCB42080EF39; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:34:40 -0600 (CST)
Received: from maia-1.hub.org (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191])
by marte.gdl.cinvestav.mx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170CC20099FA3
for <joel(dot)espinosa(at)cts-design(dot)com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:17:04 -0600 (CST)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by maia-1.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055E7DB6780;
Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:16:56 -0300 (ADT)
Perhaps <joel(dot)espinosa(at)cts-design(dot)com> is the culprit here. I'm CCing
owner on this message.
Thanks for the suggestion, Tom.
Colin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2008-03-31 17:47:50 | Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-31 17:38:04 | Re: [pgsql-general] Daily digest v1.8030 (22 messages) |