Re: Script binaries renaming

From: Zdeněk Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Script binaries renaming
Date: 2008-03-26 12:21:34
Message-ID: 47EA3FCE.1040008@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Magnus Hagander napsal(a):
> On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 21:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

<snip>

>> Are we really prepared to break everyone's scripts for this?
>
> I wonder how many people actually use those commands :-) I know I always
> use psql with a commandline parameter, and the majority of other peoples
> scripts that I've come across also do that. So I'm not sure exactly how
> important it is.
>
> Another option then might be to simply deprecate their use, and
> eventually get rid of them, instead of renaming them?

In one of my mail I also mentioned to replace all of these commands by one (e.g.
pg_cmd) which will integrate all of them. Removing is not good solution for
people who writes scripts, because process psql output is complicated and there
is not easy way how to run vacuum on all databases for example.

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-03-26 12:30:16 Re: Script binaries renaming
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-03-26 12:11:59 Re: Script binaries renaming

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-03-26 12:30:16 Re: Script binaries renaming
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-03-26 12:11:59 Re: Script binaries renaming