Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: We should get active ...

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>
Cc: damien(at)dalibo(dot)info, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: We should get active ...
Date: 2008-02-25 21:04:21
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgeu-general
Susanne Ebrecht a écrit :
> Cédric Villemain schrieb:
>> Susanne Ebrecht a écrit :
>>> damien clochard schrieb:
>>>> [...]
>>>>   I think the main feature we need for our wiki is some good 
>>>> internationalisation. I'd like our website to be accessible in 
>>>> serveral language, not just english.
>>>> We definitely need a simple way to edit and translate the pages.
>>>> i don't know about TWiki, but dokuwiki has the simpliest 
>>>> multilanguage module i have ever seen.
>>> Damien,
>>> for what?
>>> We don't make support at the European group. All what we discuss is 
>>> just "organisation" stuff. For most stuff the language based 
>>> communities are responsible and they already have language based 
>>> communication bases.
>> Because we will probably translate the content to be readable by 
>> non-english people.
> Ok, that is an argument. But don't expect it before 2034. Consider, 
> when I look to the past, often we weren't able to translate flyers in 
> time for an event ... do you really think, we will find the time to 
> translate web pages? :)
> But think about the future and to a or 
> or or 
> or whatever make sense.
off topic :
search for apache

I find the option of apache handling very nice. At least it work very 
well on, on there is no translation :-/

>>> I am not sure, if we need a wiki at all.
>> not sure, but I think the point here is :
>> Do we continue *only* by mails ? wiki and  cms offer voting  module 
>> (or do, yes), discussion webpage to get talk for specific 
>> content without forget in wich mail/thread we have read,decide 
>> something. You have feed by page so you can follow exactly what you 
>> want, I find that very usefull.
> I would say, to protect ourselves from stupid users we should avoid 
> wiki/forums. Also it seems, that Europeans are master of long threads. 
> I don't want to have such a long thread like this "Design of Italian 
> T-Shirts" at a wiki. Also I have to less knowledge about wiki and 
> access controlling.
> It shouldn't be so easy for everybody to read our internal stuff. It's 
> ok, when somebody read the archive (he has to know, how to find the 
> stuff there). Think to donation reports that the leaders will make 
> every quartal or every year. I don't want this numbers at a wiki, 
> where everybody easily can read how many money we have.
> An access controlled "only internal" wiki would be ok, but what about 
> "hacking" a wiki?

wiki have good ACL component not an issue.

and page are split in at least 3 things : the page, the discussion page, 
plus the revision page.

> For votes wiki could make sense but therefor there will be single 
> other tools outside and also we are all programmers, therefor we could 
> code a quick programm on our own. :) is a great place for voting. I agree we all can do that, but 
have we time to rewrite what have already been done ? I am for open source.
> Susanne
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Cédric Villemain
Administrateur de Base de Données
Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53 -

In response to


pgeu-general by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2008-02-25 22:51:49
Subject: Re: We should get active ...
Previous:From: Susanne EbrechtDate: 2008-02-25 20:57:43
Subject: Re: WHAT to push to internet

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group