| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dirk Riehle <dirk(at)riehle(dot)org>, Koen Martens <pgsql(at)metro(dot)cx>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Thoeny <peter(at)thoeny(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig |
| Date: | 2008-02-17 16:14:18 |
| Message-ID: | 47B85D5A.2000808@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Ned Lilly wrote:
> Thanks for posting this, Dirk (and Peter). I don't think any of us
> would disagree that different models yield different results, and that
> the Postgres community model is more focused on developing a great
> product than (necessarily) a single great company. However, I'm curious
> about Rod's market share comment - is that documented in any meaningful
> way?
It's great that they posted it, but they obviously don't understand
PostgreSQL. It's doesn't have a business model :P, it isn't supposed to.
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-17 16:49:06 | Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig |
| Previous Message | Ned Lilly | 2008-02-17 15:42:00 | Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig |