Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig

Thanks for posting this, Dirk (and Peter). I don't think any of us would disagree that different models yield different results, and that the Postgres community model is more focused on developing a great product than (necessarily) a single great company. However, I'm curious about Rod's market share comment - is that documented in any meaningful way?

Regards,
Ned

--
Ned Lilly
President and CEO
xTuple (formerly OpenMFG)
119 West York Street
Norfolk, VA 23510
tel. 757.461.3022 x101
email: ned(at)xtuple(dot)com
www.xtuple.com

On 2/17/2008 3:59 AM Dirk Riehle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know the twiki.net folks and was curious why they would be bashing
> PostgreSQL, so I asked Peter Thoeny about this. He asked me to post his
> clarification on Koen's email, see below. Please don't respond to me,
> I'm not involved in the TWiki community. If you have further comments
> please address Peter directly.
>
> Dirk
>
> ---8><-----------8><-----------8><-----------8><-----------8><--------
>
> Public statement by Peter Thoeny, TWiki.org founder:
>
> Dear PostgreSQL community,
>
> Please accept my apologies on behalf of the TWiki community. I took
> notes during the meeting, and I am sorry I did not log all relevant
> pieces that have been said about PostgreSQL during the meeting.
>
> Since Rod is out of town, let me try to state what Rod said at the
> meeting, to the best of my recollection:
>
> "PostgreSQL has arguably the best open source RDBMS technology, but
> unfortunately they lost market share to companies with lesser
> technology. I consider the PostgreSQL business model a failure, because
> there is no leading company associated with it. This has been publicly
> stated by some PostgreSQL community members." He went on to say that
> successful models are open source communities with one driving company
> alongside them: MySQL, RedHat/Fedora, Zimbra, JBoss, etc.
>
> I find it unfortunate that Koen is using words in this forum like "bad
> advocacy by TWiki bigwig" without first clarifying things with the
> person involved. I am not sure what the intent of this e-mail was. It is
> too easy to take stuff out of context in an online medium.
>
> Full disclosure: TWIKI.NET is working towards a win/win/win for the
> TWiki community, sponsoring companies and customers. Koen is in a small
> group of TWiki consultants who have not bought into this strategy.
>
> My apologies again for the stir, kind regards,
> Peter
>
>
> ---8><-----------8><-----------8><-----------8><-----------8><--------
>
>
> Koen Martens wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hey All,
>>
>> I'm an active member of the TWiki community, which is an open source
>> structured wiki. We had a community summit these past two days. It was
>> in the US, and i attended virtually, one of the attendants was not too
>> positive about PostgreSQL:
>>
>> http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/TWikiCommunitySummit2008Q1
>>
>> search for 'postgres' on that page and you'll see.
>>
>> Just thought i'd share it (well, after i shared it on #postgresql-eu
>> Andreas prompted me to share it here too)!
>>
>> While at it, we're currently revising the governance of the TWiki
>> project, and i wrote this topic today:
>>
>> http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/Codev/LearningFromPostgreSQL
>>
>> Hope i got my facts straight!
>>
>> Gr,
>>
>> Koen
>>
>> - -- K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
>> Networking, hosting, embedded systems, unix, artificial intelligence.
>> Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iD8DBQFHth/hktDgRrkFPpYRAjdCAJ0bYj3GxSrnVS0o/MhZrrSsBQfB1wCfWQ4t
>> s1C18fhlK/WVt5QcfgsWXU0=
>> =BrHV
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org
>>
>>
>