Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> And indeed, most stuff works, but \d for a specific table fails. Has
> there been talk of making a backwards compatibility nod here? I don't
> want to downgrade my development machine, and I don't control the remote
> machine. How fundamentally different is the protocol -- and would it be
> feasible to support both?
Feasible no doubt, but fiddly and useless to most.
You can have multiple installations on the same machine. I think most of
the developers do as do many of the rest of us. What platform are you
running? Debian has built-in support for this, but you can do it
yourself for most installations.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd