Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw
Date: 2019-06-12 11:16:54
Message-ID: 478c8dfc-0c64-c2c3-1e3f-6dd688354e1d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-06-11 08:11, Andres Freund wrote:
> While working on fixing [1] I noticed that 2dedf4d9a899 "Integrate
> recovery.conf into postgresql.conf" added two non-rethrowing PG_CATCH
> uses. That's not OK.

Right. Here is a patch that addresses this by copying the relevant code
from pg_lsn_in() and timestamptz_in() directly into the check hooks.
It's obviously a bit unfortunate not to be able to share that code, but
it's not actually that much.

I haven't figured out the time zone issue yet, but I guess the solution
might involve moving some of the code from check_recovery_target_time()
to assign_recovery_target_time().

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Remove-explicit-error-handling-for-obsolete-date-tim.patch text/plain 14.6 KB
0002-Don-t-call-data-type-input-functions-in-GUC-check-ho.patch text/plain 5.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2019-06-12 11:36:08 Re: Adaptive query optimization
Previous Message Siarhei Siniak 2019-06-12 10:11:05 Re: GiST limits on contrib/cube with dimension > 100?