Re: egrep is obsolescent

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: egrep is obsolescent
Date: 2026-05-13 15:55:43
Message-ID: 475061.1778687743@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> On 13.05.26 17:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I did not touch the two usages in port/aix/mkldexport.sh, though.
>> I'm not sure what the standardization situation is in AIX, and
>> this warning doesn't seem like something they'd do anyway.

> It appears that those invocations don't actually need the "e" part of
> egrep, so they could just be grep?

Oh, good point. I'll make it so, just for cleanliness.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-05-13 16:30:13 Re: [PATCH] Fix errhint messages for REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) restrictions
Previous Message Paul A Jungwirth 2026-05-13 15:42:53 Re: FOR PORTION OF does not recompute GENERATED STORED columns that depend on the range column