Re: hardware and For PostgreSQL

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Ron St-Pierre <ron(dot)pgsql(at)shaw(dot)ca>
Cc: Joe Uhl <joeuhl(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ketema Harris <ketema(at)ketema(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hardware and For PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-11-01 06:57:02
Message-ID: 472978BE.9@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Ron St-Pierre wrote:
> Joe Uhl wrote:
>> I realize there are people who discourage looking at Dell, but i've been
>> very happy with a larger ball of equipment we ordered recently from
>> them. Our database servers consist of a PowerEdge 2950 connected to a
>> PowerVault MD1000 with a 1 meter SAS cable.
>>
>>
> We have a similar piece of equipment from Dell (the PowerEdge), and when
> we had a problem with it we received excellent service from them. When
> our raid controller went down (machine < 1 year old), Dell helped to
> diagnose the problem and installed a new one at our hosting facility,
> all within 24 hours.

24 hours?! I have a new one for my HP boxes onsite in 4 hours, including
a tech if needed...

But I assume Dell also has service-agreement deals you can get to get
the level of service you'd want. (But you won't get it for a
non-brand-name server, most likely)

Bottom line - don't underestimate the service you get from the vendor
when something breaks. Because eventually, something *will* break.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ow Mun Heng 2007-11-01 07:46:01 Re: Hardware for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-11-01 06:54:50 Re: Hardware for PostgreSQL