| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)gmail(dot)com>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jean-Christophe Arnu <jcarnu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <andreas(at)scherbaum(dot)la> |
| Subject: | Re: Euro PG conference? |
| Date: | 2007-10-10 17:51:09 |
| Message-ID: | 470D110D.4070008@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgeu-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> A city, without a working group and a real project, must not even
>> be mentioned. I believe that candidate cities come up with a proposal
>> and then we work it out. Proposing cities as we are doing now will
>> take us nowhere.
>
> This is correct. We certainly need to make sure we have boots on the
> ground, which is why I brought up France. As I see it from a boots on
> the ground perspective these are our options:
>
> France
> Italy
> Germany
> Britain
>
> Of these four, Italy and France see to be the most useful. (Honestly,
> Britian doesn't do much for me, I already speak english ;)).
Britain was already "disqualified" because they're not euro-zone.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-10 18:17:34 | Re: Euro PG conference? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-10-10 17:45:35 | Re: Euro PG conference? |