Re: Are we done with sync-commit-defaults-to-off patch?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are we done with sync-commit-defaults-to-off patch?
Date: 2007-09-10 17:01:55
Message-ID: 46E57883.4070502@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Maybe we should lower the autovac naptime too, just to make it do some
>> more stuff (and to see if it breaks something else just because of being
>> running).
>>
>
> Well, Andrew has committed the pg_regress extension to allow buildfarm
> animals to set nondefault GUC values. So I think it'd be sufficient if
> a buildfarm owner or two would volunteer to run with small autovac
> naptime.
>
>

What settings do you have in mind for a testing regime?

If anyone wants help on setting this up for a buildfarm member, please
let me know.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-09-10 17:21:49 Re: Maybe some more low-hanging fruit in the latestCompletedXid patch.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-10 16:45:27 Re: Maybe some more low-hanging fruit in the latestCompletedXid patch.