Re: Are we done with sync-commit-defaults-to-off patch?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are we done with sync-commit-defaults-to-off patch?
Date: 2007-09-10 01:52:33
Message-ID: 15139.1189389153@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe we should lower the autovac naptime too, just to make it do some
> more stuff (and to see if it breaks something else just because of being
> running).

Well, Andrew has committed the pg_regress extension to allow buildfarm
animals to set nondefault GUC values. So I think it'd be sufficient if
a buildfarm owner or two would volunteer to run with small autovac
naptime.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Marshall 2007-09-10 02:42:58 Re: Hash index todo list item
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-10 01:40:13 Re: GucContext of log_autovacuum