Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-21 13:30:36
Message-ID: 467A7D7C.2000902@gmx.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marko Kreen wrote:
> Considering Postgres will never user either "meter" or "mile"
> in settings, I don't consider your argument valid.
>
> I don't see the value of having units globally unique (literally).
> It's enough if they unique in the context of postgresql.conf.
>
> Thus +1 of having additional shortcuts Tom suggested.
> Also +1 for having them case-insensitive.

Agreed. Although I suggest perhaps to not press for "m" as minutes,
because it really is ambiguous for "months" or "minutes", esp. in a
context like "log_rotation_age".

Please lets have the unambiguous abbreviations. Please lets make it all
case-insensitive. After all this discussion, what about a straight
forward vote? Bruce, we had those before, no?

Best Regards
Michael Paesold

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Kreen 2007-06-21 13:48:19 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Previous Message Michael Paesold 2007-06-21 13:24:51 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent