| From: | Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent |
| Date: | 2007-06-21 12:48:25 |
| Message-ID: | 467A7399.4010201@janestcapital.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2007 00:38 schrieb Gregory Stark:
>
>
>>>I think people are worried that an 'm' in one column might mean something
>>>different than an 'm' in another column, and perhaps that is confusing.
>>>
>>>
>>To whom? the person writing it?
>>
>>
>
>If everyone around here had gotten their way we'd already be in a situation
>were you could write
>
>log_rotation_age = 5m
>log_rotation_size = 5m
>
>
Would it be a bad idea to always support the multi-character
abbreviations? So the min, sec, hr, day, wk, mth, yr ar all, to my
knowledge, unambiguous. As are kb, mb, gb, tb. So the above would be:
log_rotation_age = 5min
log_rotation_size = 5mb
edinburgh_distance=5mi
Brian
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-06-21 12:50:58 | Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-06-21 12:38:53 | Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent |