From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Heap page diagnostic functions |
Date: | 2007-05-01 17:28:07 |
Message-ID: | 463778A7.5010209@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>>> Any suggestions? pgdiagnostics?
>>
>>> Yes, I like "diagnostics", or "internals". I just think forensics isn't
>>> going to be understood by the average native English speaker, let alone
>>> non-English speakers.
>>
>> "diagnostics" is a two-dollar word also. It might be a bit more widely
>> known than "forensics", but it's longer and harder to spell. Not that
>> I have any great suggestions to make. Maybe "pgtestfuncs"?
>
> I thought about pgdebugfuncs myself at first. But that's so generic and
> pgtestfuncs even more so. Diagnostics is pretty good, that word is in
> use in other languages as well as a medical term, so it's meaning would
> be clear to a lot of people even if they've never encountered the
> English word before.
>
> Besides, the audience for these functions is quite narrow: people
> working on PostgreSQL internals, so I don't think the language issue
> matters that much.
I did not find "forensics" in translator and It mentions in Oxford
vocabulary but explanation is not clear for me. I agree with Bruce It is
not good name. What about short form of diagnostic "diag"?
Zdenek
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-05-01 17:55:43 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-05-01 17:21:55 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |