| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Dorochevsky, Michel" <michel(dot)dorochevsky(at)softcon(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock object |
| Date: | 2007-04-27 08:44:16 |
| Message-ID: | 4631B7E0.4030407@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Attached is the complete patch against HEAD to prevent hashtable bucket
> splits during hash_seq_search. Any comments before I start
> back-porting? I suppose we had better patch this all the way back,
> even though AtPrepare_Locks() is the only known trouble spot.
Looks good to me.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-27 16:22:24 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #3244: problem with PREPARE |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-04-27 08:31:06 | Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock object |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | rancpine cui | 2007-04-27 08:53:01 | How does the partitioned lock manager works? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-04-27 08:05:38 | Re: [PATCHES] Reviewers Guide to DeferredTransactions/TransactionGuarantee |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-27 14:02:25 | Re: Hash function for numeric (WIP) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-27 08:09:38 | Re: Hash function for numeric (WIP) |