| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Reviewers Guide to DeferredTransactions/TransactionGuarantee |
| Date: | 2007-04-27 08:05:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1177661138.3715.71.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > That should go away entirely; to me the main point of the separate
> > > wal-writer process is to take over responsibility for not letting too
> > > many dirty wal buffers accumulate.
> >
> > Yes
> >
> >
> > I'll make the agreed changes by next Wed/Thurs.
>
> I have seen no patch yet with the agreed changes.
True, will be at least a few more days yet.
I've got a few questions I'll post later today.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-04-27 08:44:16 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock object |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-04-27 08:03:58 | Re: Interaction of PITR backups andBulkoperationsavoiding WAL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-27 08:09:38 | Re: Hash function for numeric (WIP) |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-04-27 07:47:49 | Hash function for numeric (WIP) |