Re: Auto Partitioning

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Auto Partitioning
Date: 2007-04-06 16:22:55
Message-ID: 461673DF.6050605@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


> But if we could find a way to represent that it would make a lot of common use
> cases much more convenient to use.
>
>>> (But that sounds rather like pie in the sky, actually. Which other
>>> databases can do that, and how do they do it?)
>> Oracle does it, by building a big index. Few people use it.
>
> The people that use it are the people stuck by dogmatic rules about "every
> table must have a primary key" or "every logical constraint must be protected
> by a database constraint". Ie, database shops run by the CYA principle.

Or ones that actually believe that every table where possible should
have a primary key.

There are very, very few instances in good design where a table does not
have a primary key.

It has nothing to do with CYA.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-06 16:59:29 Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-04-06 15:36:58 Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-04-06 16:38:34 Re: Packed Varlena Update (v21)
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-04-06 14:54:39 Re: Fix for large file support