From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Dilger <pgsql(at)markdilger(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
Date: | 2007-03-20 21:19:05 |
Message-ID: | 46004FC9.3000204@samurai.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jeremy Drake wrote:
> The patch has been sitting in the unapplied patches queue for a while, and
> the inevitable bitrot finally caught up with it. This version of the
> patch is exactly the same as the one in the patches queue, except for
> using new, non-conflicting oids for the functions.
>
Applied -- thanks for the patch. BTW, a few cosmetic comments:
* #includes should be sorted alphabetically (unless another #include
sort order rules take precedence, like including "postgres.h" first).
* patch included some trailing CR line endings
* IMHO using "++var" in the increment component of a for loop is bad
style in C (if only because it is needlessly inconsistent; good C++
style is not necessarily good C style)
* Comments like "/* get text type oid, too lazy to do it some other way
*/" do not exactly inspire confidence :)
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2007-03-20 22:11:43 | Question about the TODO, numerics, and division |
Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-03-20 21:06:31 | Re: modifying the tbale function |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-20 21:31:09 | Re: Code-Cleanup: char* -> const char* |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-03-20 18:45:49 | Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback |