| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ |
| Date: | 2007-03-03 17:12:02 |
| Message-ID: | 45E9AC62.1080208@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I have added to the developer's FAQ that we don't want
>> non-BSD-compatible licensed patches:
>
> How frequently is this actually a problem?
Every single time someone submits a patch with no license but with a big
legal disclaimer in their signature. Which is why this all came about.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-03 17:12:40 | Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-03 16:12:50 | Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ |