From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ |
Date: | 2007-03-03 16:12:50 |
Message-ID: | 200703031612.l23GCoK25088@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have added to the developer's FAQ that we don't want
> > non-BSD-compatible licensed patches:
>
> How frequently is this actually a problem?
I don't think it is common. I didn't add that part, so if you also
think it is rare, I will remove that distinction. New text:
<li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. By posting a patch
to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the PostgreSQL
Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute your
patch under the BSD license. If the patch is not BSD-licensed, it
will be rejected.</li>
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-03-03 17:12:02 | Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ |
Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2007-03-03 14:19:55 | Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! |