Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date: 2007-02-23 16:15:57
Message-ID: 45DF133D.2010606@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
comments.

Thanks Zdenek

Rich Teer wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 2969
> Logged by: Rich Teer
> Email address: rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.2.2
> Operating system: Solaris 10
> Description: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
> Details:
>
> Hi there,
>
> First, many thanks for providing the best open source database! I've
> spotted a couple of errors/bits of bad advice in doc/FAQ_Solaris, which I
> think should be updated.
>
> 1. The answer to question 3 (Why does configure complain about a failed test
> program?) says to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to the directory containing
> the missing libs. While this does work (as does the other suggestion of
> using LD_RUN_PATH), the correct answer to this question is to include the
> library's path in the executable by using the -R flag, thus avoiding the
> need for the end user to mess about with environment variables. For
> example, I use "LDFLAGS=-R/usr/sfw/lib ./configure ..." to build Postgres
> which uses Sun's OpenSSL.
>
> 2. The answer to question 8 (Can I use DTrace for tracing PostgreSQL?) says
> that Solaris 10u3 or newer is required to handle probes in static functions.
> Unfortunately, this is not the case. DTrace can't be enabled when using
> update 3 (aka 11/06); the (as yet unreleased) update 4 or newer is
> required.
>
> Thanks for reading!
>
> Rich Teer,
> Author of Solaris Systems Programming
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Attachment Content-Type Size
FAQ.patch text/x-patch 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-02-23 16:16:58 Re: BUG #3048: pg_dump dumps intarray metadata incorrectly
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-02-23 16:06:33 Re: BUG #3052: Inconsistent results from PQexec... with rules

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-23 18:26:25 Re: \prompt for psql
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-02-23 12:15:36 Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum