| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <richard(at)levitte(dot)org>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, monotone-devel(at)nongnu(dot)org, wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org, stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question |
| Date: | 2007-02-22 17:09:48 |
| Message-ID: | 45DDCE5C.9000107@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
>>
>> Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>>> 1. Do you want to stay with CVS or do you want to move to something
>>> else?
>>
>> Most PostgreSQL developers currently want to stay with CVS. Only some
>> desperate souls including myself are fiddling with other VCSes.
>
>
> I really don't think this is a correct characterisation. What is true, I
> think, is that many remain to be convinced that the benefits of any
> proposed change outweigh the likely pain, and I suspect many are also
> uncertain about what's happening in the SCM space and prefer to wait
> until the dust settles some.
I believe that is much more accurate. The reality is, switching to
something else will be painful. I would prefer not to be on CVS as well
but it would take a lot of work and cvs does what we need it to.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-02-22 17:16:13 | Re: Column storage positions |
| Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2007-02-22 17:07:13 | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |