Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work)

From: Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work)
Date: 2007-02-06 23:59:04
Message-ID: 45C91648.8080400@alpinenetworking.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com> writes:
>> I thought that the following todo item just barely missed 8.2:
>> "Allow a warm standby system to also allow read-only statements [pitr]
>
> No, it's a someday-wishlist item; the work involved is not small.

Thanks,very much for the info. I'm not sure why I thought that one was
near completion. I can now come up with an alternative plan.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Gigger 2007-02-07 00:03:30 Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work)
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-02-06 23:47:08 Re: referential Integrity and SHARE locks