> On 1/4/07, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 09:09 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> > That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not
>> > would be to auto-process all patch submissions.
>> Sounds a good idea. Patch farm anyone? Auto apply/make check?
> I'm actually trying to simplify something I was working on at OSDL to
> do this. PLM at OSDL was a little to Linux focused. Will let
> everyone know when I have a working prototype.
Feel free to discuss design/functionality any time. For example, a
mechanism to feed patches to the buildfarm has previously been
suggested. If this could be done in some automated, controlled and
reasonably safe way it might be useful - it might afford reviewers a
"try before you buy" option. Also, hooking this up with the stuff that
Lukas Smith is doing might be good.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-01-04 17:53:44|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-01-04 17:20:32|